Jack West
Gallente
|
Posted - 2011.01.01 05:47:00 -
[1]
I get this happening every time i try to run Sisilauncher (or default eve test patch)
start time: 20101231 16:53:14 python version: 2.5.4 (r254:67916, Dec 23 2008, 15:10:54) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] repair tool version: 0.00 Restoring folder: "C:\EveSingularity" Build folder Info: Checkum DB: "C:\DOCUME~1\CHARLE~1\LOCALS~1\APPLIC~1\CCP\EVE\C_EVES~1\checksums" usescriptindexfiles: 1 appname: EVE region: ccp sync: 214371 server: Tranquility edition: premium version: 6.34 role: client build: 214371 branch: //depot/games/EVE-RELEASE/eve aid: 0 __name__: main codename: EVE-EVE-RELEASE port: 26000 cryptopack: CryptoAPI repair url: http://content.eveonline.com/test/RepairData_217138.dat client directory: C:\EveSingularity Downloading index: 0.0%, 0.0 bytes/432.37 KB, 0.0 bytes/s, 00m00s Downloading index: 100.0%, 432.37 KB/432.37 KB, 74.96 KB/s, 00m02s Checksumming client: 0.0%, 0.0 bytes/5.42 GB, 0.0 bytes/s, 00m00s Checking files: 0.0%, 0.0 bytes/4.98 GB, 0.0 bytes/s, 00m00s Downloading rollsums: 0.0%, 0.0 bytes/2.14 MB, 0.0 bytes/s, 00m00s Traceback (most recent call last): File "progressPanel.pyc", line 97, in _TaskRun File "repairUI.pyc", line 67, in Start File "repairLogic.pyc", line 310, in Repair File "repairLogic.pyc", line 186, in RestoreFolder File "zsync\zsync.pyc", line 176, in RestoreFolder File "zsync\zsync.pyc", line 321, in GetDownloadRangeSet File "zsync\zsync.pyc", line 292, in GetFileRestorers File "zsync\zsync.pyc", line 406, in GetRollsums File "zsync\readFromUrl.pyc", line 50, in ReadFromUrl File "urllib2.pyc", line 124, in urlopen File "urllib2.pyc", line 381, in open File "urllib2.pyc", line 399, in _open File "urllib2.pyc", line 360, in _call_chain File "urllib2.pyc", line 1107, in http_open File "urllib2.pyc", line 1082, in do_open URLError: <urlopen error (10054, 'Connection reset by peer')> Total Runtime: 0h01m12s
Any clues?
Basically just times out at the "downloading rollsums" part.
As a sidenote.. With all the variety of problems that I see that people are having with patching...My god.. The new patching method doesn't exactly look robust. Hope they consider giving us the classic method of patching until the autopatcher sorts itself out.
|